請用以下經修正及配合 search engine 標題格式的 link 作為網誌的嵌入，以便可一體化觀看，thanks.http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=QD1RvQoL3pE
請用以下經修正及配合 search engine 格式的 link 作為網誌嵌入，以便一體化觀看，thanks。http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=QD1RvQoL3pE
其實整體OK 啦...不過不失.不過有少少缺點, 就係雖然係口語化出街, o但在中文節目就應該不要夾點英文...我真係第一次睇同類節目有D咁既評述手法..但平心而論我覺得你道出了香港人的心聲...值得嘉許!不如請介紹下你怎樣獲得這個節目的出鏡機會?以及日後還會有嗎?
No I actually think the pace of this one is better than the first one, the first one on taxi fare is really too...... very slow. This pace is about right.But may I know how exactly is this different from Mr 萧若源's article on 香港的希望。All the original ideas came from there, you just quoted it all and sub it with some recent news e.g. Bangkok airplane. Those are not your original ideas.
yes... i have his consent in reading out his idea in essay 香港的希望。because it explains why 香港is政治癱瘓。一針見血，and can't be modified.
I actually think it will be more illuminating, if you could explain the hk political scene with some economic concepts. Afterall you were trained as an economist.Your brother did an excellent job in explaining political issues with a strategic perspective.
Look though Mr Siu's article is 一針見血but your brother derek has made an excellent point in his essays.That is HK people still think in the way that HK is an independent city/place. It is not, it is part of China. And with that in mind, every policy implemented by policy makers should be evaluated from the perspective of the central government. Risk assessment should be calculated not in HK but the whole of China.
Erica, I hope the next time you host the program, you should stand up the elderly being ripped off by the bus companies.http://dare-say.blogspot.com/2008/12/youd-better-drive-your-own-car-than.htmlAnd by the way, if anyone thinks we should think about government policies from the perspective of the central government or the whole of china, I suggest him/her to petition the CPG to first scrap the Basic Law (it's better to come clean than hiding, isn't it? after all, mainland elites may provide better chief executives than locals) The next thing he/she should do is start paying taxes to the central government. Thanks.
我覺得你既評論係有內容但係要注意下唔好無啦啦有英文e.g "無common sense"少d 廣東話助語詞..e.g. 呢, 個喎同埋個tone 似返評論, 唔好咁descriptive加油
做得幾好嘛, 不過就真係越講越快~哈, 時間分配得好一點就冇問題啦~
hk's predicament in politics is that we have problems that do not exist in dictorship reign (media is under control) or a democratic country (those in power are accountable to the people).
老蕭同意你用佢o既觀點,但係你quote出來o既觀點再用來解釋八百人小圈子,咁樣一定萬試萬靈,不過就未能針對地評論今次港人滯泰事件,當政府做事唔妥,搬出特首無認受性,何須要再評論呢?你話香港傳媒似鯊魚群針對官員,令班官少做少錯,你會唔會本末倒置? 你o既 presentation就好似認為政府傳係被傳媒累事.你似乎好強調 "i have his consent in reading out his idea in essay 香港的希望。" hahaha...
dear mr lnot really the US is one country.California has their constitution can enact policies that are not implemented by the State as a whole. e.g. environmental policies.
I am not saying HK policies should be separated from the interest of HK people.I am saying if we calculate the risk of the implementation of policies, the implication to China factor should be included in our consideration.Afterall we are part of China.
彌明, 妳部署緊從政??? 屍屍
I'm afraid these days many of our policies are neither in the interests of HK people nor of the mainland of China. (They might be in nobody's interests - see my LOST DECADE OF HONGKONG http://dare-say.blogspot.com/2008/11/lost-decade-of-hong-kong.html)http://dare-say.blogspot.com/2008/12/suicidal-magnanimity.html
好似台長同蕭生咁講, 搵人幫下手執下的演講節奏及語調, add oil